Viewing entries in
running coverage

Comment

Believing the hype

Deciphering the reports and the photos from last Saturday's big race in Boulder, Alan Culpepper sat back and allowed pre-race favorites Adam Goucher and Dathan Ritzenhein do all the hard work through the first 10 kilometers. It was then that the race went from Goucher trying to stick with the next great American distance hope Ritzenhein, to the former champ Goucher attempting to keep Culpepper from dominating that final two kilometers.

It didn't happen.

Culpepper, fully under control and surging toward to the tape, won Saturday's cross-country championships in Boulder, Colo. by completing the muddy and snowy 12k course in 37:09 to Goucher's 37:35 and Ritzenhein's 37:47.

Interestingly, upon hearing the results by repeatedly refreshing hurriedly typed reports on a running message board, running geeks (like me) sounded a nationwide, "Wow! What a surprise… what got in to Culpepper?"

Here's the thing about that – Culpepper, 34, has been to the Olympics twice in two different events, won two previous national cross-country titles, as well as a national title in the 5,000, 10,000 and marathon. In 2003 Culpepper ran a 2:09:41 at the Chicago Marathon and finished fifth in 2:11:02 after an aggressive effort at the 2006 Boston Marathon.

Yet with those outstanding credentials Culpepper's victory on Saturday is an upset. Why? Was it the rough day he had at the New York City Marathon last November? Perhaps – after all, Culpepper had to drop out because he couldn't stay hydrated despite drinking throughout the race. Couple that with what I wrote about Culpepper before the New York City race and it's easy to understand why the running geeks (like me) believed Ritz, Goucher or Abdi Abdirahman were the runners to beat in the deep field. To wit:

And of course I'd like to write that American Alan Culpepper is going to let it all hang loose and be risky instead of his typically intelligent tactics. Culpepper is always consistently steady, which produces great times but it isn't exactly inspiring. To steal a phrase from baseball players, Culpepper doesn't like to "get dirty."

Culpepper got dirty, literally, on Saturday. Better yet, those so-called "intelligent" tactics served him well. In the end, when the race was on the line, Culpepper ran the two kids into another muddy ditch. There's definitely something inspiring about a tough race run well.

More: Daily Camera (Boulder) running section

Denver Post: "Boulder's 'Running Town' Reputation Safe"

The results

  1. Alan Culpepper, Lafayette CO 37:09
  2. Adam Goucher, Portland OR 37:35
  3. Dathan Ritzenhein, Boulder CO 37:47
  4. Jorge Torres, Boulder CO 38:07
  5. Michael Spence, Ogden UT 38:15
  6. Zach Sabatino, Morgantown WV 38:16
  7. Fasil Bizuneh, Flagstaff AZ 38:24
  8. James Carney, Marina CA 38:25
  9. Jason Lehmkuhle, Minneapolis 38:26
  10. Edwardo Torres, Boulder CO 38:31

What happened?

Abdi Abdirahman, my choice to win the race, finished 21st in 39:07.

Hyped just right

Meanwhile, the press covering the event in The Running Republic of Boulder gave the race rave reviews. The town, the event, the course and the fans all lived up to the pre-race hype, which is saying something. In this distance running Super Bowl only the finishing times seemed lopsided with an estimated 10,000 fans lining the course two-to-three people deep to watch a cross-country race. According to the dispatches from Boulder, New York City has a high hurdle to leap for November's marathon Olympic Trials.

We'll definitely have to see that one first hand.

DOMINATION

While the men's national championship was an upset with the old man knocking off the young bucks, the women's race was a coronation. And it wasn't just a new thing, as in Deena Kastor is the best American runner of her era. Nope, that's not good enough.

On Saturday Deena Kastor proved that she is the best woman American runner ever.

Yeah, she's even better than Joan Benoit Samuelson.

Nevermind that Kastor owns three of the top four marathon times in U.S. history, or that Samuleson won the Olympic gold in 1984, the Sullivan Award in 1985, and at 50, Joanie can still run an Olympic Trials-qualifying time for the marathon, what Kastor did to the field on Saturday is ridiculous.

Kastor won her eighth cross-country championship by covering the 8k course in 26:47. That's 61 seconds better than second-place finisher Shalane Flanagan, which is almost unheard of in a national championship race. A five-second victory is significant, but 61 seconds is more than domination if there is such a thing.

Here's the crazy part. Just two weeks ago Flanagan set the American indoor record in the 3,000 meters, and actually led the race after two kilometers. But according to the race recap from Letsrun.com, Flanagan said, "I think it was a little naïve to think that I could run with her."

From Letsrun.com:

Kastor and Flanagan were well clear of the rest of the field not even 2k in, and in third was Kara Goucher who had a big gap over the rest of the field. Kastor however wasted no time in destroying the young upstart Flanagan. She pulled away from Flanagan and soon the lead was 10 seconds, 20 seconds, and then 30 seconds. Flanagan was not faltering, however, as she had 30 seconds up on the third place Goucher. Kastor was just putting on one of the most dominating performances in the history of American women's distance running.

It's going to be really interesting to see what Kastor does in Boston in April.

More: Watch the races and check out the entire day in Boulder on Flocast

Comment

Comment

Writing on the run

Despite the way it appears in every single issue of Runner’s World, there is never a shortage of topics to write about with running and track. There is always a race in the rearview mirror or approaching, always an up-and-comer to put together a feature on, and always some new trend lurking around the corner.

It just doesn’t have to about diet and fitness and trying to finish that local 5k.

If it were up to me and I could manage my time better than an amphetamine addict with attention-deficit disorder, I would write something on this site every day. And no, it wouldn’t be this mindless crap about the wind, workouts and bad racing, either. It would be good, kind of like what Steve Nearman and Jim Hage do for the Washington papers, or Mike Sandrock does in Boulder.

I could be wrong, but that trio could be the only guys writing regularly about running in major papers. Yes, there are guys writing about the local scene at smaller papers, but those guys cover other local sports, too. What is intriguing about this is that running is incredibly popular based on the numbers in the local road races and well-known marathons. In fact, the popularity of running seems to rise every year with people wanting to be able to say they have completed a marathon, etc.

So it would seem to make sense that coverage would reflect the readership’s tastes. Right? More people run than play bowl or bowl, yet those sports always seem to find their niche in local newspaper’s coverage of sports.

It goes without saying that there are many reasons for this. Newspapers are dying and cutting employees like crazy, and those that remain are stretched thin just trying to keep up with the important stories that the other stuff slips through the cracks.

From my experience, sports writers at newspapers don’t participate in sports unless it’s golf. Fitness, let alone running, just doesn’t enter into the realm of consciousness for the sports media.

Besides, even though running is viewed as difficult, it is looked on as tedious and mundane. Anyone can do it, but not everyone can hit a baseball or play football. Those sports require “athleticism” where running is the haven for those who were too small or uncoordinated to make the football, baseball or basketball team.

As an aside, in retrospect I wish I had been on the cross-country team instead of the baseball, basketball and football teams.

Instead of getting into the tired “why-isn’t-running-covered” discussion, let’s talk about running. In The Washington Times, Nearman wrote about up-and-coming American Fernando Cabada, who turned in a stellar 2:12 in the Fukuoka Marathon two weekends ago.

Meanwhile, Hage wrote about Katie McGregor and her plans to concentrate on the 10k for the 2008 Olympics instead of the marathon, where she ran 2:32 in her debut last month in New York.

Is Washington the new running hot bed? It seems so with the big story in the Washington City Paper with the huge story on Matt Centrowitz, the Olympian and Oregon star, who has turned little American University into a force. Could Centrowitz be in the running for the track coaching job at Oregon?

Three papers in the District writing regularly about running? Very nice.

In Boulder’s Daily Camera they cover running (and cycling) the way they cover the Red Sox in Boston. Then again they should, because almost all of their readers run or have been in the Olympics. That’s the way it is out there. Everyone wants to race.

Anyway, I hope to write more about running here in the future, but I can’t make any promises. Last week a trade by the Phillies and some other mainstream sports news sidetracked me, and this week it’s all Allen Iverson, all the time for the foreseeable future. Nevertheless, I’ll promise this much – I will cover the Penn Relays and the Olympic Trails Marathon in NYC on Nov. 3.

That’s a guarantee.

Meanwhile, to make matters worse this Iverson stuff has messed with my own running as well. I’m sitting here waiting for him to get traded and haven’t been able to go out to run yet today. I guess that’s fine since I ran 20 yesterday in 2:12:22 with miles 11 to 16 in 32:03 and the final 3.7 miles in 24:43. Long runs, of course, are the cornerstone of any training program. As long as I get those in I feel good about everything else.

Now if I can just get as fit anaerobically as I am aerobically.

Post-script: I finally got out for a run at 4 p.m. and put in 14 miles in 1:31:16. It didn't feel as if I got my heart rate up at all and I think I could have run all day.

Perhaps one day I will go out and run all day.

Comment