Viewing entries in
Texas Rangers

The Texas Rangers and the ghost of Richie Zisk

Richie_zisk When you’re a kid, certain things mean more than they would if you were an adult. Before anyone writes in and says, “Duh!” to that last sentence, we’re coming to a point… eventually.

For instance, when I was probably six I got my first baseball glove. It was a Christmas gift wrapped under the tree and when I opened it, I really didn’t know what the hell it was since it didn’t have much to do with Batman, the "Emergency" TV show or Star Wars. But the details of that first glove—the nuance­—explains a lot more than three decades later.

Before that brown, Wilson glove went everywhere with me, the stitching and writing were incredibly intriguing. Below the web were the words, “Grip-Tite Pocket,” which probably didn’t mean anything aside from some marketing schtick. In Rawlings gloves it reads, “Deep Well Pocket,” which is probably the same thing, or a fancy way for the glove makers to say, “If you squeeze it when the ball arrives, you will catch it.”

Nevertheless, the most interesting part about the glove wasn’t the gimmicks, the color, size or even the brand. It was the signature of someone named, “Richie Zisk.”

Why would the Wilson company sell baseball gloves to kids with Richie Zisk’s autograph on the pocket? It sounds like a pretty good question these days, but in the mid-to-late 1970s, Zisk was an above-average player kind of like Andre Ethier, as the Baseball-Reference comparables shows from the stats. But baseball stats weren’t inflated in the 1970s, so Zisk was probably more like Jayson Werth without the speed, or Corey Hart from the Brewers.

Werth and Hart are both All-Star players, but it’s doubtful their signatures are moving much in the way of leather from Wilson or Rawlings. Zisk even spent several seasons primarily as a DH and was top five for outfield errors twice (top three for fielding percentage twice, too), yet his signature stamped on gloves was enough to entice people to buy them. Specifically, my parents.

So just who was Richie Zisk?

Zisk, from Northern New Jersey, a Seton Hall alum and a longtime hitting coach in the Florida State League for the Cubs, was an MVP candidate with Pittsburgh in ’74 when he batted .313 and had 100 RBIs, and belted 30 homers with 101 RBIs and a .290 average for the Chicago White Sox, better known as the Southside Hitmen, in 1977. He’s better known, however, as the Pirates’ replacement in right field for Roberto Clemente after his death on New Year’s Eve of 1972. He was a September call-up for the World Champion Pirates in ’71 and batted .400 in the NLCS from 1974 to 1975.

After the 1976 season the Pirates traded him to Chicago for Goose Gossage and Terry Forster, mostly because they had Dave Parker, Al Oliver and Omar Moreno ready to play the outfield. But they also traded him because, according to Pirates manager Danny Murtaugh, Zisk was a "lazy dreamer." Apparently Murtaugh didn't realize that when we think about it, a lazy dreamer is all anyone really wants to be.

“He’d stand out in the field and think about a movie he’d seen,” Murtaugh said, unaware that sometimes that's all a guy can do in the outfield.

Dreamer or not, the trade worked out pretty well since Zisk was a cog in the middle of the White Sox lineup and 20 of Gossage’s 26 saves were longer than one inning and nine were more than two innings, including a September four-inning save while the Pirates were trying to catch the Phillies in the NL East.

But when kids like me where getting Richie Zisk gloves for Christmas it was 1978 and Zisk and Gossage were the big free-agent acquisitions that winter. Goose, of course, signed on with the Yankees and won the World Series, while Zisk jumped to the Texas Rangers for a 10-year, $3 million deal where it was hoped he would be the difference for a team that won 94 games and came in second place in 1977.

Things started out well for Zisk in Texas in 1978. Firstly, reunited with Oliver in the outfield, the Rangers were a strong mix of speed and power. Most baseball analysts saw the Rangers as the team to beat in the AL West and maybe even the team to represent the American League in the World Series simply because they signed Zisk, got Oliver and had lefty Jon Matlack to pitch alongside Hall of Famer, Fergie Jenkins. There was nothing to dispel those notions when Zisk hit a walk-off homer off Gossage in the bottom of the ninth on opening day to beat the Yankees, 2-1.

It only got better for the first half of the season. The Rangers were in first place in late June and hanging around the top of the standings by the All-Star Break. Meanwhile, the fans voted Zisk to be the starting right fielder in the 1978 All-Star Game in San Diego where he batted cleanup and 1-for-2. It wasn’t quite like the 2-for-3 showing with a two-run double he belted off Tom Seaver in the 1977 All-Star Game at Yankee Stadium, but Zisk was a solid All-Star who hadn’t quite reached his prime.

Still, an eight-game losing streak to end July with a 10-20 record proved to be too much to overcome despite the fact the Rangers ended the season with 15 wins in the final 17 games.

Needless to say, before the 1980s had begun, Zisk and the Texas Rangers were worth buying high.

Only that was as good as it got.

The Rangers went backwards in 1979, finishing third. In 1980 they came in fourth and finished under .500. Zisk, didn’t exactly fade off statistically, rather, he just stayed the same. In 1978 he was an All-Star with 22 homers, 85 RBIs and a .262 average. In ’79 he went 18/64/.262. In 1980 Zisk hit 19 homers, drove in 77 and batted .290, but by then it was time to rebuild for the Rangers. Texas used him as the centerpiece in an 11-player deal with Seattle.

Zisk played just three seasons for the Mariners before retiring at the end of the 1983 season. In 1981 he was named Comeback Player of the Year when he batted .311 in the strike-shortened season. Though he played in approximately 100 fewer games for the Mariners, Zisk posted better advanced stats in Seattle than he did for Texas. When he retired at age 34 he hit 207 homers and had an .818 OPS with a .287 batting average.

Zisk All told, it was a nice career.

But was it the type of career where the guy’s signature is pressed onto baseball gloves and then sold to parents to give to kids for Christmas? Probably not in the age where a player’s Q-rating matters more than his slugging percentage. The generations that followed kids like me likely had gloves modeled from Derek Jeter, Alex Rodriguez or Ken Griffey Jr. Big stars signed gloves in the ‘70s, too. In fact, I still have my Johnny Bench Rawlings catchers’ mitt from way back and it’s still as good as ever. A little thin in the pocket, but ready for game action.

So what’s the deal with Zisk? Here’s my theory… maybe gloves, bats and iron-on shirts (I had a Luzinski decal… it was cool) are comparable to the modern day jersey-shirt, or “shirsey” in the popular parlance?

Either way, it’s possible that Zisk would have been able to move a whole lot of gloves if his Rangers got to the World Series the way this year’s club finally did. Since replacing the original Washington Senators in 1961, and then moving to Arlington, Tex. in 1971, the Senators/Rangers never won a playoff series… though they surprisingly find themselves trailing in the World Series to the Giants, 2-0.

Jon Miller, the current ESPN and Giants play-by-play man started out calling Rangers’ games and figured if any of the teams he worked for (the Orioles, Red Sox and A’s for a year) would have been able to get to the World Series, it would have been Zisk’s Rangers in 1978. Maybe that’s why Wilson put Zisk’s name on the gloves. Maybe they figured that the Rangers were going to get to the World Series so they might as well get ahead of the curve.

Who would have known that it was going to take the Rangers until 2010 to finally get there?

Why can't we quit Cliff Lee?

Cliff_leeIt was a preposterous idea. Know how they say truth is stranger than fiction? Yeah, well this one was just too strange for even that. In the most sordid and obscene of tawdry ideas, just the thought of it should make one’s skin crawl and spine shiver.

Cliff Lee pitching in Game 1 of the World Series at Citizens Bank Park? Against Roy Halladay?

It was just too good to be true, wasn’t it?

“I pulled for a lot of those guys, but it’s weird, when a team gets rid of you, you kind of like seeing them lose a little bit. I know that’s weird but part of me wanted them to win where I could face them in the World Series, too. It would have been a lot of fun. You’d like to think that they need you to win type of stuff, when that's really not the case,” Lee said from Tuesday’s media day at AT&T Park in San Francisco, 3,000 miles away from South Philly.

“When a team gets rid of you, it's funny how you have a knack for stepping up a little more when you face them. There’s a little more incentive to beat them, and that’s definitely the case with me watching the game. I was in between. I didn’t want to have to face them or want to have to face the Giants. I let that series play out, and I pulled for those guys individually, but I didn’t mind seeing them get beat, either, just because they got rid of me. That is what it is.”

Oh that Cliff… telling the Phillies they got what they deserved?

Nevertheless, while folks lament the Phillies’ offensive (used as offensive as in a segment of a baseball game and offensive as in deplorable) flop in NLCS, it’s almost like a little, sarcastic dig at the team’s oh-so sensitive brass that Cliff Lee will pitch on Wednesday night. Only instead of pitching for or against the Phillies, Lee will pitch against the not-so celebrated hitters of the San Francisco Giants at AT&T Park.

Coincidentally, the last time Lee pitched at AT&T Park he pitched a complete game, four-hitter to beat the Giants in his debut with the Phillies on July 31, 2009. They weren’t the same Giants that Lee will face on Wednesday night, but they were not too far off. If anything, Lee was different then… he walked two batters.

“It does seem like a long time ago, but I remember I went through all nine innings that was pretty good,” Lee said of his Phillies’ debut. “And I remember I almost went out of this park opposite field, too. That was fun.”

Yes, he’s still as cool as ever. Unflappable might be the best word because he never, ever changes his approach or his routine. He still runs on and off the field, still pantomimes a throw into center field from behind the mound before he begins to warm up before an inning, and still throws that low 90s-mph fastball.

Of course he throws that cut fastball exactly where he wants it to go. He throws it no matter what the situation is or if he’s behind in the count. Hey, the ball is in his hands so everyone else will have to adjust to him. Better yet, he was in charge after games, too. He didn’t treat his arm with ice like most pitchers. Even after a career-high 272 innings pitched (counting the playoffs) in ‘09, Lee never strapped his arm in an ice pack after a game. In 16 of his 39 starts Lee pitched into the eighth inning. He averaged 104 pitches per start and hardly walked anyone.

And then he got even better.

It might be that mindset that helped the Rangers through the ALDS for the first time and then to the World Series for the first time in franchise history, and yes, that includes when it started out in Washington as the Senators in 1961.

“Tremendous work ethic. You know, you see him from afar, you never see him prepare to do what he does out there,” Texas manager Ron Washington said during his media day press conference. “He has tremendous work ethic, and more than anything else, he brings influence. The way he goes about his business, the energy which he plays with, the passion he has for the game, the things he goes out there and never let affect him, those are the type of qualities that a No. 1 guy brings, and it just influences every other pitcher that follows him or that's on that pitching staff. That's what he brought to us. That's one thing I didn't know.

“I knew he was a quality pitcher, but I never got a chance to see how each day that he prepares for his starts. It's amazing the work he puts in to go out there and then accomplish what he accomplishes.”

Washington is Lee’s fourth manager since the start of the 2009 season and he is also the fourth manager to say the same thing about the lefty. The Phillies gushed over Lee a lot during the postseason, too.

Of course where Lee endeared himself the most to the fans and his teammates in Philadelphia was during the playoffs. Sure, there was a bit of the dreaded “dead-arm” phase toward the end of the regular season, but when properly rested thanks to the dark nights in the playoff schedule so the networks could regroup[1], Lee also re-gathered himself, too. All he did was put together the greatest postseason by a Phillies pitcher, ever.

Better than Cole Hamels, Steve Carlton, Robin Roberts, Tug McGraw, Jim Konstanty and maybe even better than ol’ Grover Cleveland Alexander against the Red Sox in the 1915 World Series. Lee didn’t make his playoff debut with a no-hitter like Halladay, or end his maiden postseason game with outs against Hall of Famers Babe Ruth or Harry Hooper, but Lee was a lot more consistent.

He allowed one run against the Rockies in Game 1 of the NLDS and took the lead into the eighth inning of the clinching Game 4 before errors and the bullpen cost him a win. Had Lee held on in that one he would have become just the third person in Major League Baseball history to win five games in a single postseason.

Cliff Added all up, Lee went 4-0 with a 1.56 ERA, including a masterful 10-strikeout, three-hitter in Game 3 of the NLCS and a 10-strikeout gem in Game 1 of the World Series where the best the Yankees could do was score an unearned run in the ninth.

No, there wasn’t a no-hitter in there, but Lee got the Phillies to the World Series and won both of the team’s games there.

So it makes sense that there is some sensitivity amongst guys like Ruben Amaro Jr. in regards to Lee. In fact, the 2010 season was almost a mirror image of 2009 for Lee. He was again traded in July from an American League doormat to a contender. Again he had some back and arm issues where he missed both the first month of the season and a handful of starts late in the year.

But when the playoffs started, Lee has been even better than he was last year with the Phillies. Going into his Game 1that will not be played in Philadelphia on Wednesday night, Lee is 3-0 with an 0.75 ERA with 34 strikeouts and one walk in 24 innings.

Pretty good, huh?

Now here’s the thing… give up on Lee at your peril. The Yankees couldn’t swing a deal for him and paid for it during the regular-season and the playoffs. Tampa Bay could have used him, too, but in the end he beat them twice in the postseason. Sure, the Phillies picked up Roy Oswalt and he was spectacular during the second half of the season. But if Amaro thought for a second that the offense would be outdone by the Giants’ lineup in the NLCS, do you think he would have given up on Cliff Lee?

Maybe the better question is just what was about Lee that keeps folks in Philly talking? After all, he arrived at the end of July and was gone by the second week of December. That’s not a long time at all and yet we’re still talking about the guy and paying attention whenever he pitches a big game.

Just what was it about Cliff Lee?


[1] It’s not exactly top-notch planning that the first game of the World Series will be played on the same night as the opening of the NBA season. Hey, I’d rather watch baseball over just about anything, but I understand why a person would want to watch LeBron James and the Miami Heat play the Sixers on Wednesday night. LeBron made a little news earlier this year and people love/dislike him so much that they can’t take their eyes off him. Apparently the MLB brass and the networks whiffed on this one.