Viewing entries in
Hall of Fame

Reliving Hall of Fame weekend

HOF COOPERSTOWN, N.Y. — There was so much that happened during the Hall of Fame induction weekend that it was impossible for a guy to write about all of it. What also makes it difficult for one guy is that my train of thought is to encapsulate each event instead of simply reporting what happens. For instance, when Bert Blyleven talked about his curve ball, well, that was a 1,000-word story and not something to summarize.

Hey, some people think about weird things like that.

Nevertheless, with the benefit of this little site and a lazy day at home, here's the best of what I saw at the Hall of Fame induction weekend...

The point of the trip was to cover Pat Gillick's induction into the Hall. Gillick, of course, was the Phillies' general manager from 2006 to 2008 where he put together the start of the greatest era of the franchise's existence. The Phillies were founded in 1883 and since then have lost more games than any professional sports franchise on earth. That's not hyperbole, that's the truth.

The Phillies' history is crowded with bad moves, bad thinking, bad players and bad losses. The Phillies were the last franchise in the National League to integrate its roster and needed 97 years to win its first championship. Don't think for a second that those two elements do not go together. Almost 10 years to the day after Jackie Robinson broke destroyed segregation in Major League Baseball, the Phillies got a guy named John Irvin Kennedy, who played in five big league games in 1957 and then that was it. Kennedy got to the plate twice, struck out once and scored a run as a pinch runner.

Kennedy stuck around with the Phillies until May 3 before toiling away for the next five years in the team's farm system, mostly in the south, which must have been a lonely existence for him. For the Phillies, though, it wasn't until a trade with Brooklyn brought aboard a shortstop named Chico Fernandez that they fielded a black ballplayer in the regular lineup. Fernandez, however, was from Cuba and it wasn't until Dick Allen came along in 1964 until the Phillies had a significant African-American player.

By 1964, Jackie Robinson had been retired for nearly a decade.

So yeah, the Phillies' history is littered with bad times. Yet since Gillick came around before the 2006 season, the team has been in the playoffs in every season since 2007, been two the World Series twice and have one of the most diverse rosters in the game. Sure, the club may have been headed that way with Ed Wade as the general manager, but it was with Gillick where everything came together.

Besides, it's been said that the Phillies needed Gillick more than he needed them, though it seems as if the Hall of Fame career reached its apex with the 2008 World Series title. Ask Gillick and he'll tell you that without the World Series victory in '08 and he probably doesn't get to Cooperstown.

"Baseball is about talent and skill and ability," Gillick said poignantly during his induction speech. "But at the deepest level it's about love, integrity and respect. Respect for the game, respect for your colleagues, respect for the shared bond that is bigger than any one of us."

Then again, it's not like people try to get to Cooperstown... do they? Don't answer because they do. Billy Wagner, the former closer for the Braves, Red Sox, Mets, Phillies and Astros outwardly aspired to achieve enough to get into the Hall of Fame. It was a numbers race for Wagner and with 422 career saves, he probably fell a bit short for election by the BBWAA. Injuries cost him the end of the 2008 season and most of the 2009 season, but at 38 Wagner came back and saved 37 games for the Braves last year. The fact that Wagner was a terrific quote and always able to fill up a reporter's notebook should not hurt him when the Veterans' Committee gets its shot.

Of course when Lee Smith retired, he had saved more games than any pitcher in history. Despite that, he is headed to his 10th year on the Hall of Fame ballot and just got 45 percent of the vote last time around. If Lee Smith can't break through, what chance does Wagner have? Add in the facts that neither Smith nor Wagner ever got to the World Series and the road to Cooperstown gets even rockier.

Regardless, there were always whispers that Bill Conlin quietly campaigned to win the J.G. Taylor Spink Award, which is the de facto "writers' wing" of the Hall of Fame. Moreover, the Spink Award is the highest honor given to a writer from the BBWAA and the common mistake is to label it an induction into the Hall. It's not, but that's just semantics.

Nevertheless, whatever campaigning tricks he employed worked and Conlin had his day in Cooperstown on Saturday where he delivered the first address at the inaugural Awards Presentation at Doubleday Field. And frankly, the speech was terrific. As Conlin's colleague Rich Hofmann wrote in the Daily News' web site:

Conlin thanked his family and friends, and then the technology cooperated, and then he was off. All of the tools familiar to his half-century of readers in the Daily News were in evidence during his 10-minute speech: needle, scalpel, bludgeon, pie-in-the-face, and Battle of Gettysburg.

He was him.

Rich nailed it. But it is always curious to me that Conlin has always been labeled as a baseball guy for the past couple decades despite the fact he doesn't regularly go to games. Excluding postseason and spring training, where he often is found at the ballpark, I can count on one hand the number of times Conlin was seen at the ballpark for a regular-season game. The way it seems is that it is a badge of honor for the old ball writer to show up at the park four hours before game time to make the scene, yet Conlin gave up on that long ago. I can’t say I blame him, because the waiting around is for the birds. However, Conlin stopped going to the ballpark regularly when he was at age younger than guys like Jayson Stark. If we're talking as pure baseball writers, who adhere to the old-school unwritten laws of the BBWAA, Stark should be the next Spink Award winner.

Besides, if a baseball writer doesn't actually go to the park, he's pretty much just like those bloggers he has been railing against for years and years.

Photo2762 The elite club

As far as speeches go, Conlin was fantastic. Better yet, he had something to tick-off everyone, including Hall of Fame president Jeff Idelson and chairman of the board of directors, Jane Forbes Clark, who dropped their heads as if to say, "Oh no he didn't!" after certain sentences.

Still, induction weekend is about the Hall of Famers and its new members. Actually, to those in the know, Hall of Fame induction weekend is like the debutante party, prom and homecoming dance all rolled into one for Jane Forbes Clark.

Heir to the Singer Sewing Machine fortune and of the famous Dakota building on Central Park West in Manhattan, Clark's grandfather started the Hall of Fame in 1935 when he converted an old gym into a small museum. By 1936, Clark's grandfather had turned the little museum into the capitol of the game of baseball and invited Babe Ruth, Ty Cobb, Honus Wagner, Connie Mack and Walter Johnson to his little Shangri-La on the banks of Lake Otsego to be the first Hall of Fame class.

And as the decades have raced on, everyone associated with baseball knows all about the Hall of Fame and Cooperstown. Though named for author James Fennimore Cooper and his family and once the summertime home for Union general Abner Doubleday, the town could very easily be named Clarkstown instead. After all, not only does Clark run the Hall of Fame down to the tiniest detail where she even determines how the museum is decorated, her family owns nearly all of the land around the area with the aim to keep it from ruining the perfect idyllic quality of Cooperstown.

Besides, the Hall of Fame not only is baseball's apex, it's Clark's family showplace. In the meantime, her aim seems to make the Hall of Fame the most elite of the elite secret societies.

In an interview with the Palm Beach Post, Clark said the Hall of Fame more or less defines its members.

"I think it's important for fans to see all of the Hall of Fame members, and in talking to the Hall of Famers it's important to them because the Hall of Fame is a huge part of their life," she said.

"I don't think you've ever interviewed a Hall of Fame member who didn't say how special it was to be a part of that elite fraternity. And that's exactly what it is. I wanted the fraternity to start coming back together and spending time together."

Only 14 of the 65 living members of the fraternity did not return this past weekend. Gary Carter could not make it because he is fighting brain cancer. Poor health also made it difficult for Willie Mays, Willie McCovey and Stan Musial to attend. But Henry Aaron, Nolan Ryan and Cal Ripken were noticeably absent. So too was Carl Yastrzemski. Meanwhile, Mike Schmidt did not attend and Steve Carlton has been absent the past couple of years.

But Ryne Sandberg took a few days off from managing the Phillies' top farm team to be there, as did the big brass in the Phillies' front office like Ruben Amaro Jr. David Montgomery, Bill Giles and Dallas Green.

Alomar The best since Morgan

Still, the weekend was Ms. Clark's celebration for baseball and her family's museum as well as the new members of the elite fraternity. Gillick, just the fourth general manager to receive the induction, is someone we've written about exclusively for the past week, but haven't had much of a chance to mention the other inductees, Roberto Alomar and Bert Blyleven, both of whom had to wait a bit to get the call. Alomar missed by a handful of votes in his first year of eligibility on the BBWAA ballot last year, while Blyleven got in after 14 years along with a few of those spent actively campaigning for the votes.

I only caught Joe Morgan toward the end of his career and not in his MVP heyday during the 1970s. It was during that stretch where patron saint of the statistical wing of baseball fandom, Bill James, wrote that Morgan was the greatest second baseman ever to play the game.

In the years that followed, however, Roberto Alomar took the mantle from Morgan and ran with it. I missed the brunt of Morgan's career, but I saw every bit of Alomar's and he's easily the best second baseman I have ever seen. The best example of his hitting prowess I remember was during the 1993 World Series where he can Paul Molitor destroyed the Phillies' pitchers. Alomar went 12 for 25 with a couple of doubles, a triple and six RBIs. He had a hit in every game of the series, including four in Game 3 and three in the clinching Game 6.

Sure, Alomar was a career .300 hitter and played the third-most games at second base in history, but what makes him a Hall of Famer in my book was how he ratcheted it up for the playoffs. Frankly speaking, if we're looking at ballplayer and their career as nothing more than a pile of numbers, then maybe the postseason stats should be the most important? That is where the winners are decided.

Anyway, Alomar was the MVP of the 1992 ALCS where his home run off Oakland's Dennis Eckersley in the ninth inning of Game 3 sent it to extra innings and kept the Blue Jays on the path to win their first World Series title.

It's interesting to point out that Alomar received 90 percent of the votes in his second trip through the voting process after falling five votes short in 2010. Think about that for second... Alomar was not a first-ballot Hall of Famer because of five votes. In falling five votes short, Alomar was denied in an election in which five voters sent back blank ballots, while admitted steroid user David Segui, pitchers Pat Hentgen and Kevin Appier, as well as first baseman-turned-broadcaster, Eric Karros, combined for five votes. That’s 10 wasted votes and does not include the nine votes spent on Ellis Burks and Robin Ventura.

All of those guys were nice players, but there isn’t a Hall of Famer in the bunch. If the people who voted for guys like Diego Segui or Kevin Appier don't know that, then maybe they should reevaluate the voting process.

So with those 19 votes that were spent on making a point, silly politics, vendettas, or drunken dares, very easily could have been spread out so that worthy candidates like Alomar. Better yet, maybe Blyleven gets in with Andre Dawson in 2010 instead of 2011. Maybe then Gillick has the stage to himself this year or maybe a player like Barry Larkin, Jack Morris, Lee Smith, Jeff Bagwell or Tim Raines breaks through?

Apparently, what cost Alomar those five votes was the unfortunate incident where he spit on umpire John Hirschbeck during an argument at the end of the 1997 regular season. The voting writers held this mistake against Alomar despite the fact that Hirschbeck and Alomar have buried the hatchet and become friends. This protest vote was made despite the fact that Ty Cobb, Babe Ruth, Cap Anson, and Juan Marichal are Hall of Famers. Among those names are men who attacked a crippled fan, punched an umpire, beat an opponent on the head with a bat, and helped foster nearly a half-century of institutional racism and segregation.

Some say without Cap Anson, baseball never would have been a sport that denied the inclusion of some because of the color of their skin.

But, you know, Alomar spit at a guy...

Alomar is in now, though, and from the looks of it, Hall of Famers are not differentiated by the amount of vote they get. Shoot, Joe DiMaggio didn't even get elected to the Hall of Fame on the first ballot. Yeah, try and figure that one out.

Nevertheless, the neat part about Alomar's induction is that he is just the third player from Puerto Rico to get in. There is Alomar, Orlando Cepeda and the great Roberto Clemente, and that's it. Alomar is also the first Blue Jays player to be elected so that brought out tons of fans from Canada and Puerto Rico for Alomar.

It also brought out his family, including Sandy Sr., a former player and coach with the Angels, Braves, Yankees, Rangers and Indians. Sandy Sr. was a teammate with Blyleven on the 1977 Texas Rangers and faced both Alomar brothers. Roberto went 1 for 2 with a triple against his Hall of Fame partner, while Sandy Jr. went 3 for 7 with two doubles. Blyleven did strike him out once, though.

Sandy Jr. introduced his brother and told a story about when as minor leaguers in the Padres' chain, the pair shared an apartment with just one bed. Sandy Jr. says the rule was the guy who had the better game got to sleep on the bed and the other guy slept on the couch.

"I slept on the couch all season," Sandy Jr. deadpanned. "And I hit .300!"

Blyleven Blyleven finally made it

As for Blyleven, the long trip to the Hall of Fame seemed to be complete when he got to sit on a rocking chair next to his mother on the porch at the Otesaga Hotel that overlooked Lake Otsego. That was the pure, genuine moment that Blyleven could say to himself, "I made it."

“I did it yesterday. My mother Jennie, she's 85 years old, came in from California, so that's a long way for her to come. My sisters, my brother, my kids, we are all on that porch, we are chasing people away, but we got the rockers and we got my mother out front and we kind of reminisced a little bit about Pops, my dad, but mainly just enjoyed the company,” Blyleven said on Saturday. “And what I do, the broadcasting and also live in Florida, I don't see my family that much, so it was a nice reunion. And that's part of what this ceremony is all about for me, not only having the opportunity to have my mother here witness me go into the Hall of Fame, but also my family and friends.”

Blyleven was one of the more controversial inductees over the past few years. He fell two votes short in 2010 only to make it by 28 votes this time around. That’s a far cry from 17.5 percent Blyleven received in his first time on the ballot in 1998. In his second year his votes tally actually dropped more than three percent before his candidacy began to pick up steam about five years ago.

Truth is, I’ve gone back and forth on Blyleven’s Hall of Fame worthiness. In fact, I’ve been changing my mind about him all week, even while watching him give his induction speech. The drawback I had was if one has to mull over a players’ Hall of Fame-ness, then maybe he’s not a Hall of Famer. The answer should be, “yes” or “no,” immediately.

A Hall of Famer is a Hall of Famer, right?

Ah, but baseball is much more complicated than that. Sure, Blyleven had just a 287-250 record, won 20 games once and never finished higher than third in the Cy Young balloting. He also only went to the All-Star Game twice and gave up a major league-record 50 home runs in a season.

He was never a dominant pitcher.

Fair enough. But Blyleven was always there. He threw more than 270 innings eight times, with more than 290 innings three times. Once, Blyleven threw 325 innings during a season where he completed 25 of his 40 starts. Moreover, Blyleven was the staff ace on two different World Series champions—the 1979 Pirates and 1987 Twins. His biggest outing might have been in Game 5 of the ’79 series when down 1-0 in the sixth inning and down 3 games to 1, Blyleven came on in relief on three-days rest and pitched four innings of shutout ball.

From there, the Pirates won games 6 and 7 to stun the Orioles.

No, Blyleven’s stats aren’t sexy, but there is something to be said for a guy who was guaranteed for a minimum of seven innings for 22 years.

And of course he had that curveball, too. Yes, some say Blyleven’s curve, one he learned as a kid in Southern California from watching Sandy Koufax, was the best ever to be thrown. It was one of the 12-to-6 types that started out at the hitters’ neck and ended at his ankles. Hitters didn’t just bail out on it, they surrendered.

He called it a “drop,” though and made sure to listen in on the radio when Vin Scully called Koufax’s games.

“I grew up listening to Vince Scully describe Sandy Koufax’s drop,” Blyleven said. “Of course they had that 15-inch mound back in the '60s when I grew up in southern California. I remember the only Dodger game I ever went to was Sandy Koufax against Juan Marichal, one nothing. I sat up in the nose bleed section. I was just getting into baseball. I had to be 10 or 11-years old.  And I recall the foul pole was in my vision of the mound at Dodger Stadium and I had to lean on my left almost the whole ball game. And Sandy, we were sitting down the left-hand line, Sandy's back was to me, but Juan Marichal, we saw the high leg kick, which is unbelievable what he was able to do and then Koufax—I could almost picture it there the drop that, the mound, the tilt they had on that mound was incredible and I remember that and listening to Vin Scully describe his curveball or his drop, that's basically how I learned mine. I visualized what he did and then just on a block wall or playing with my friends, I picked up the curveball.” 

Maybe Blyleven is the Hall of Famer for those with specific talents. He ate up innings and had a rare pitch. His talent was not as all-encompassing like Alomar’s was, but it takes all kinds in baseball. That’s why Tommy John ought to be in the Hall of Fame and Jim Kaat, too, says Blyleven.

Why not? It takes all kinds.

Hall of Fame weekend: Greed is good

2011-07-23_15-24-53_781 COOPERSTOWN, N.Y. — The fellows in the Cooperstown Rotary Club are pretty crafty. Knowing that the induction weekend is the largest collection of Hall of Famers in one spot anywhere under the sun, the Rotarians have commemorative miniature baseball bats made with each inductee’s superlatives.

At $5 to $7 a pop, it’s a pretty nice bit of cash to be made in a weekend.

But also understanding the mind of the collector, the guys in the Cooperstown Rotary know that there probably won’t be much of a market for certain keepsake bats. For instance, there were piles of Jim Bunning bats from when the former Phillies and Tigers pitcher was inducted in 1996. There were plenty of Eddie Murray bats too.

Could it be because Bunning has created a reputation for being a creep?

However, don’t go looking for a keepsake bat with umpire Doug Harvey’s name on it. There was a run on those last year when Harvey’s family and friends bought them all up.

“We made 50 of them for Doug Harvey and when they walked up and down Main Street and found out there wasn’t anything with his name on it, they snapped them all up,” a Rotarian said.

So thinking there would be a repeat of the run on Harvey mementoes, they made a limited number of Pat Gillick bats, who will be inducted to the Hall of Fame on Sunday afternoon along with Roberto Alomar and Bert Blyleven. After all, Gillick is kind of like an umpire in that he wasn’t known as a player. Plus, there are nine umpires enshrined in the gallery at the Hall of Fame and Gillick will be just the fourth general manager. Better yet, when Nolan Ryan was inducted in 1999, it took 12 years to sell all 300 bats.

In that case, there is no sense in flooding the market with items that might not sell.

Actually, just 50 bats for Gillick might not be enough. That’s especially so when noting that Alomar and Gillick are the first two members of the Toronto Blue Jays to be enshrined here in Cooperstown, and the media and fans contingent from Canada is pretty strong this weekend.

There are so many Canadians in Cooperstown for the induction ceremonies that Gillick had trouble going on a routine walk around town.

“I was out yesterday for a while in the street and it took me about an hour and a half to get back,” Gillick said during Saturday’s Hall of Fame press conference with Blyleven and Alomar.

Undoubtedly, Gillick was hit up for a few autograph requests. Truth is, Main Street in Cooperstown during Hall of Fame weekend looked like a wild bazaar where autograph and memorabilia collectors and dealers trolled the street looking to collect certain signatures on specific pieces. With 51 of the 65 living Hall of Famers in Cooperstown for the weekend, it was as if Main Street was a smuggler’s paradise.

Two men amidst the fray on Saturday afternoon carried a matted poster containing the signatures of 19 of the 20 living members of the 3,000 hit club. The only autograph missing?

Derek Jeter.

Strangely, this piece of memorabilia wasn’t in the museum on display. Instead, it was as if it were Main Street had become overrun with the money changers in the temple from the New Testament. Up and down the street high-priced baseball cards and elaborate, one-of-a-kind signatures were presented for sale and it made one baseball fan wonder…

What is the point of the induction weekend? Were folks in town to celebrate the national pastime or to make a buck off it.

Certainly that idyllic notion of fathers and sons talking about baseball and pouring over memories, memorabilia and exhibits in the Hall of Fame, had been replaced with the quest for collections. But not just any collectible, but instead, collections seen as pseudo-antiques in the form of pricey baseball memorabilia. Yes, it was there, but you had to really go looking for it.

Still, don’t think for a moment the Hall of Famers were being exploited. Oh no. During a two-block stroll down Main Street on Saturday afternoon, one could find most of the Hall of Famers sitting at long tables selling autographs in front of the local shops. On the north side of the street were Goose Gossage, Jim Bunning, Yogi Berra, Lou Brock, Frank Robinson and Gaylord Perry. Over on the other side of the street were Juan Marichal, Andre Dawson, Johnny Bench and the gate crasher, Pete Rose.

Pete Rose’s autograph in Cooperstown could be yours for $60 to $75. Or, one could fly to Las Vegas and go to gift shops in Caesar’s Palace and get it from Pete for free.

No, Hall of Fame weekend isn’t about the cozy images depicted in “Field of Dreams.” It’s more like “Wall Street,” only no one had to be reminded of the catch phrase, “Greed is good.” They already knew.

What the Hall: It's never easy

Bert It’s never easy to vote. Sure, the actual process is easy—just put a check mark next to your guy, hope they count it and that’s about it. Easy as that.

However, if your brain is turned on, choosing the right person to vote for is difficult. Forget about politics where a vote determines employment [1], look at something like the baseball Hall of Fame. Simply by voting a person’s life work or legacy is defined and categorized. Folks unfamiliar with the sport will immediately attach some value to a Hall-of-Famer even if they have no clue what the person did to earn the honor.

So yeah, voting is tough. In fact, for those members of the Baseball Writers Association of America who are qualified to vote for the Hall of Fame, this year’s ballot might be the most difficult in recent memory. But in a strange little twist, the difficulty will come not from voting players in, but deciding which players to keep out.

Oh yes, the so-called Steroid Era is not over yet. Call this part of it the aftershocks following an earthquake.

What happens now that Jeff Bagwell, Rafael Palmeiro, Juan Gonzalez and Larry Walker are finally eligible? After all, there are four MVP Awards, two Major League Player of the Year awards and a Rookie of the Year divvied up amongst that group. With credentials like that it would appear that a large Hall of Fame class will make the trip to Cooperstown this August. The thing is, there isn’t a slam dunk in the bunch.

Looking at the numbers on the stat sheet paints a different picture. Palmeiro, of course, is one of a handful of players to collect 3,000 hits and 500 homers. The other members of that club—Henry Aaron, Willie Mays and Eddie Murray—are enshrined. The difference, though, is that Aaron, Mays and Murray never tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs after getting that 3,000th hit, nor did they test positive shortly after wagging their fingers at Congress to scold anyone from thinking he would ever take a performance-enhancer.

Ironically, Palmeiro was the spokesman for Viagra during the latter years of his career.

Gonzalez was the AL MVP in 1996 and 1998 where he slugged his 300th career homer before his 28th birthday and became the first player in 63 years to reach 100 RBIs before the All-Star Break. Gonzalez had all the makings of a once-in-a-lifetime career until he reached his 30s and his body seemed to fall apart. Back injuries led to an end that saw Gonzalez bounce from organization to organization before finishing with the Long Island Ducks of the independent Atlantic League.

Certainly being named in the Mitchell Report or in Jose Canseco’s tell-all steroid book hasn’t helped Gonzalez’s case much, either.

Bagwell, on the other hand, is the guy no one knows what to do with. More than the gaudy numbers he produced, Bagwell was one of the biggest stars of the 1990s, and though the stats certainly matter, it was something Billy Wagner told me about Bagwell carries much more weight. According to Wagner, Bagwell was the best teammate he ever had. Moreover if respect from his peers counted for votes, then Bagwell is a landslide winner.

We just don’t know about the guy. Sure, he never tested positive nor did he ever show up in the Mitchell Report. But Bagwell seems to be guilty by association for having played with admitted steroid users Ken Caminiti and Jason Grimsley during the era where dabbling in such things was seemingly the norm.

Besides, Mark McGwire and Barry Bonds never tested positive during their careers, either, and the consensus is that the record-breaking statistics those guys piled up are tainted. The fact that McGwire hit 583 homers yet never got more than 23 percent of the votes in the BBWAA balloting explains what the electorate thinks of his records.

So is Larry Walker a first ballot Hall of Famer and/or the only guy voted in this year? Is Walker good enough to be considered in such a lofty group and did anyone think he would have a plaque in Cooperstown when he’d come to the Vet to play against the Phillies with the Expos?

If those other guys are guilty of falling prey to the silently accepted norms of the game, does Walker get penalized for playing in Colorado and the performance-enhancing altitude?

Probably not. After all, someone has to get in. Given that only Andre Dawson was voted in last year while Roberto Alomar and Bert Blyleven fell less than five votes short, Walker could be the lone first-ballot inductee alongside a few others.

Walker Then again, last year the MLB Network set up cameras at Alomar’s home because they were sure he was getting the call. Some suggested that Alomar fell short because of the unfortunate incident where he spit on umpire John Hirschbeck during a disputed call late in the 1997 season. The theory was that some writers held the mistake against Alomar despite the fact that he and Hirschbeck have buried the hatchet and become friends. This protest vote was made despite the fact that Ty Cobb, Babe Ruth, Cap Anson, and Juan Marichal are Hall of Famers. Among those names are men who attacked a crippled fan, punched an umpire, beat an opponent on the head with a bat, and helped foster nearly a half-century of institutional racism.

Some say without Cap Anson, baseball never would have been a sport that denied the inclusion of some because of the color of their skin.

But, you know, Alomar spit at a guy...

Nice Hall of Fame you have there, baseball. Apparently spitters, steroid users and gamblers need not apply. But for the violent types and the racists, sure, come on in.

Nevertheless, here’s one man’s ballot for the 2011 class of the Hall of Fame:

• Larry Walker
• Roberto Alomar
• Bert Blyleven
• Tim Raines
• Jack Morris
• Fred McGriff
• Barry Larkin
• Edgar Martinez
• Lee Smith


[1] More than ever it seems as if the only folks who get into the politics business do so because they can’t keep a job doing anything else. Check it out sometime… would you hire most politicians to do a job at your home? Why is it then we give those dregs the keys to everything?

Pat Gillick, Tommy John and the Hall of Fame

Gillick The baseball awards season is upon us, and it got under way somewhat comically when the American League Gold Glove winners were announced. From this point of view it’s a tough call on what is funnier… the masturbating bear on the Conan O’Brien show or the righteous indignation folks put on display when someone like Derek Jeter wins a fifth Gold Glove.

It’s easy to understand why the masturbating bear is funny. That’s pretty obvious. However, the call on Jeter and the furor over certain award choices is only slightly more subtle than that poor, sadistic bear. Sure, we all know that Jeter is no wizard at shortstop and might be less worthy of a Gold Glove Award than Rafael Palmiero was in 1999 when he played just 28 games at first base, but really, who cares? These awards are nothing more than some coaches, managers, players and writers patting each other on the back.

Worse, sometimes the players get a little extra cash for just placing in the voting for some awards. If that doesn’t smack of a conflict of interests, there’s a not-so-subtle bear act you can check out on basic cable.

Still, guys like me watch the process with lots of interest. Mostly, perhaps, that intrigue comes from the idea that the voting and the results somehow validate or debunk the way a person views the game. The truth is nothing could be further from the truth. As a non-voting member of the writing baseball press, there is as much validity in simply casting a ballot that won’t be counted in a story or a blog post. Baseball is subjective like that—just because a shadowy consensus says Derek Jeter is a great fielder it doesn’t mean anyone has to believe it.

Better yet, no injustice has beset a better fielding shortstop in the American League. A fraudulent process validates nothing.

Nevertheless, the Veteran Committee voting process to elect new Hall of Famers at the Winter Meetings in December will begin a new, interesting process. Rather than a Historical Overview Committee and a ballot with players whose career began in 1943 or later and were no longer eligible for BBWAA election, the Veterans Committee streamlined the voting. Beginning this year Hall-of-Fame candidates are classified into three different eras from which their career sprouted. The Pre-Integration (1871–1946), the Golden (1947–1972) and Expansion (1973 and later) eras will rotate voting beginning this year with guys from the not-so distant past going first.

To be elected into the Hall of Fame, the potential inductees need to get 75 percent of the vote, and since there are 16 on the voting committee, 12 votes are needed to get in. As such, Hall of Famers, Johnny Bench, Whitey Herzog, Eddie Murray, Jim Palmer, Tony Pérez, Frank Robinson, Ryne Sandberg, Ozzie Smith; executives Bill Giles, David Glass, Andy MacPhail, Jerry Reinsdorf; and media folks Bob Elliott, Tim Kurkjian, Ross Newhan and Tom Verducci will determine who (if anyone) will go to Cooperstown in 2011.

Of course, the committee just can’t vote for any old ballplayer or executive. Pete Rose, as we know, is on the ineligible list and cannot be on the ballot. However, the BBWAA formed yet another committee, this one called the Historical Oversight Committee to come up with a list of 12 guys to place on the ballot. After the committee met, adjourned and probably went to a dark and depressing bar to talk about how the modern era of baseball writing is nothing like it was in the old days, the list of 12 was sent to the good folks at the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, who issued a press release of those up for election.

The names on the list/release:

Vida Blue, won the MVP and the Cy Young in 1971. Won 20 games and the World Series three times with the Oakland A’s. 

Dave Concepcion, slick-fielding shortstop for the Reds and the longest tenured member of the Big Red Machine. 

Steve Garvey, clutch hitter for the Dodgers and Padres and MVP of NL in 1974. c

Pat Gillick, longtime general manager with Toronto, Baltimore, Seattle and Philadelphia. 

Ron Guidry, helped the Yankees win the World Series twice and went 25-3 in ’78 to win the Cy Young Award. 

Tommy John, pitched 26 seasons in the majors and won 288 games. 

Billy Martin, Yankees second baseman and manager of several teams. Mickey Mantles’ best friend and often a public nuisance. 

Marvin Miller, longtime head of the MLBPA. 

Al Oliver, perennial .300 hitter with the Pirates, Rangers and Expos. 

Ted Simmons, perennial All-Star catcher in the same era with Bench, Fisk and Carter. 

Rusty Staub, lefty hitter with Mets, Houston, Expos and Rangers. A great pinch-hitter late in his career

George Steinbrenner, owner of the Yankees 

Obviously, it’s a pretty good list with a handful of guys who slipped through the cracks of the initial balloting by the writers for one reason or another. However, it’s pretty weird to see the Veterans Committee list filled with ballplayers that I actually recall watching play. Of course some of those guys were at the end of the line, like Staub, who had that strange upright lefty batting stance and a body that didn’t quite fit into the ‘70s style uniforms of expansion teams like Houston, Montreal and the Mets.

Nevertheless, this is a tough ballot and here’s why…

Tommy John unquestionable impact 

Tommy_john Now, before we get started my criteria for what makes a Hall of Famer might not mesh with the conventional wisdom. For me, the greater variable is the impact the man had over statistics. Of course some stats cannot be ignored, like 500 homers, 3,000 hits or 300 wins. Still, I give points for guys who were the league's best players at their position for a bunch of years in a row. I also give kudos to players who have remarkable seasons/performances, etc. In that vein, though most of his career was underwhelming, Roger Maris would get my vote largely because of his 1961 season.

And that’s why Tommy John would get my vote.

John’s career mark was nothing to look past… far from it. He won 288 games, went to the World Series three times with the Dodgers and Yankees, has the eighth most starts (700) in big league history, and topped 200 innings in 12 different seasons. In fact, he piled on five straight 200-plus innings seasons and seven of them in the nine seasons after he underwent a revolutionary surgery to replace the ligament in his left elbow with a tendon from somewhere else in the body.

They call it Tommy John surgery.

These days it’s tougher to find a pitcher who hasn’t undergone Tommy John surgery than those without that severe-looking scar on the elbow. However, when Dr. Frank Jobe performed the first surgery on John, he was given a 1 in 100 chance at a return to his career. At age 31 when he went under the knife, John spent 18 months in rehabilitation, skipped the 1975 season, and then pitched until the age of 46.

Now, a player has a better than 90 percent chance to return from Tommy John surgery and often a pitcher returns from the surgery with a fastball that has a few extra ticks on the speedometer. So for a solid statistical ledger and for contributions to the game, John is in.

The same goes for the longtime director of the MLBPA, Marvin Miller. Actually, it’s a travesty that Miller hasn’t been inducted yet. Truth is, Miller has had more impact on baseball than any man in the history of the game. Ask any ballplayer who came into the game during the 1970s and after what Miller meant to the players. If they tell you they don’t know who he is or what he did, then they should return their paycheck, four-star accommodations on the road, chartered flights, right to test free agency, and more the generous pension. Those ungrateful slobs don’t deserve it.

 The big debate

There are a lot of close calls, but because we don’t want to go making votes willy-nilly, it’s very difficult to decide on catcher Ted Simmons, first baseman Steve Garvey, lefty Ron Guidry, or the smooth, left-handed hitting Al Oliver. After all, it’s not Simmons’ fault that he was overshadowed by better-known catchers Johnny Bench, Carlton Fisk and then later, Gary Carter.

But from a statistical view, if Carter is in then Simmons should be, too.

Garvey had a penchant for clutch hits, like that homer he hit in Game 4 of the 1984 NLCS. He also had the longest consecutive games streak since Lou Gehrig until that Ripken dude came around. Garvey also got 200 hits in a season six times, went to the All-Star Game 10 times, won an MVP Award in 1974, and appeared in the World Series five times with two different teams. Five times Garvey’s teams got to the playoffs and all five times they advanced to the World Series with ol’ Popeye arms getting 11 homers and a .338 average in 55 postseason games.

If Garvey gets in, then Oliver should, too. Largely for the Pirates and Rangers, Oliver batted over .300 11 times, went to the All-Star Game seven times and won the National League batting title with the Expos when he was 36.

How does one judge Ron Guidry? In his first full season he went 16-7 and helped the Yankees win the World Series. He did that again the next season, only he went 25-3 with a 1.74 ERA in 273 innings to win the Cy Young Award. Better yet, in an era where specialization was coming to the fore, Guidry completed nearly 30 percent of his starts, including 21 in 1983.

So if Guidry is Hall worthy, then so too is Blue. After all, if we’re talking about an impact on the game, Blue took it by storm in 1971 when he won 24 games in his first full season to win the AL MVP and the Cy Young Award. Actually, Blue’s impact went beyond baseball to the point that he accompanied Bob Hope on a USO tour of Vietnam. Later, however, his career became a cautionary tale for unfilled potential and wasted talent as he battled a drug problem. In 1985 he was part of the Pittsburgh cocaine trial with other major leaguers like Dave Parker, Willie Wilson, Keith Hernandez, Tim Raines and Jeffrey Leonard, among others.

The flat-out nays on the list go to Davey Concepcion, Billy Martin, Rusty Staub and George Steinbrenner. This is not to belittle their careers in any way, however, Concepcion was rather innovative as a shortstop and had crazy range, but he wasn’t anything to be frightened of at the plate.

Martin, while popular and talented, often wasted his talent and alienated his teams. Even though his teams were always close to the top of the standings, he won the World Series just once. His overall winning percentage (.553) and the number of pennants exactly matches that of one of his former players, Charlie Manuel.

So we have Tommy John and Marvin Miller as sure things, along with general manager Pat Gillick.

Oh yes, Pat Gillick is a Hall of Famer. It wasn’t too difficult to see that when he was running the Phillies, taking them to the playoffs twice in three years while capturing the franchise’s second World Series title. The fact is Gillick won everywhere he went and had the uncanny ability to find the one missing piece his teams needed.

Gillick as the best ever?

Marvin-miller As a Hall of Famer himself, writer Peter Gammons, calls Gillick the best ever at his job. That’s debatable, of course, like anything else. Branch Rickey was pretty darned good. So was Frank Cashen, who built those great Orioles’ teams in the 1960s and ‘70s and then put together the ’86 Mets. Still, Gillick did it under different circumstances and in both leagues with an emphasis on scouting, player make up and an eye for talent. Even more impressively, Gillick’s first head GM gig was with the expansion Blue Jays where it took him less than a decade to build them up from scratch and get them to the playoffs.

By the early ‘90s, the Jays were a powerhouse and won the World Series back-to-back in ’92 and ’93.

Oddly, teams are never as good after Gillick departs. Toronto hasn’t been to the postseason since Joe Carter hit the homer to beat the Phillies in 1993. Meanwhile, the Orioles haven’t even had a winning season since 1997 when they won 98 games. The Mariners won an incredible 116 games in 2001 with Gillick in charge, won 93 in 2002 and 2003 in his last seasons there, but have had just one winning season since.

Only the Phillies have been able to survive the post-Gillick swoon… so far.

So here’s hoping John, Miller and Gillick get the call. But while we’re at it, let’s offer up the names Bert Blyleven, Jack Morris, Roberto Alomar, Tim Raines, Larry Walker and Jeff Bagwell.

That is if we’re really sure about Bagwell.

Is Roy Halladay ready for the Hall of Fame now?

Roy The press release came out on Thursday afternoon that the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum had accepted a donation from Roy Halladay to display the jersey he wore during Wednesday night’s no-hitter. The curators of the museum already have the cap Halladay wore on that humid night in Miami during May when he pitched a perfect game against the Marlins.

In other words, a visit to the museum on Main Street in Cooperstown, N.Y. will reveal a veritable Roy Halladay wing where baseball fans can inspect a handful of artifacts from the big right-hander’s most memorable season.

So with half his uniform ready to be displayed behind glass at the Hall of Fame, it’s just a matter of time before Halladay heads up to Cooperstown himself to accept a plaque and induction alongside the all-time greats of the game.

Right?

Actually, that’s kind of a tough question and I posed to a bunch of members of the Baseball Writers Association of America with the right to vote for the Hall of Fame thusly:

If his career were to end with Wednesday night’s no-hitter in the NLDS against the Reds, would you cast your Hall-of-Fame vote for him?

The overwhelming consensus of voters polled reported that they would indeed cast a vote for Halladay even if he were to call it quits tomorrow. At worst, Halladay might cause a voter or two to mull over his worthiness for the Hall of Fame for a night or two before finally giving him the nod.

And why not? In addition to pitching a no-hitter in his playoff debut, Halladay has led the league in wins twice, shutouts three times, innings pitched four times and complete games six times. He led the league in all of those categories this season all while wrapping up his third 20-win season and probably his second Cy Young Award. With a 169-86 record with a 3.32 ERA all while averaging 235 innings per year in 13 seasons.

It’s an easy case to make, says Randy Miller, the longtime Phillies writer from the Bucks County Courier Post and Hall-of-Fame voter.

“If Roy Halladay walked away from baseball today, he would get my Hall-of-Fame vote,” Miller wrote to me. “Along with Greg Maddux, he’s the best pitcher I’ve ever covered in my 15 years on the Phillies beat. Yes, preferably you'd like him to get more wins before retiring, but he’s won 20 three times, 19 once, 17 once and 16 twice. He’s been to seven All-Star Games, and this year he’s a lock to win his second Cy Young. I’m a very strict HOF voter. Last year,I only voted for Roberto Alomar. That said, I vote for greatness, and Roy Halladay has been great for a decade.”

Easy, right?

Well, yeah simply because we know in the back of our minds that Halladay will pitch for at least four more years and will soar past 250 wins during that time. But we’re talking about right now. Forget about the future if you can. Has Halladay accomplished enough to be a Hall of Famer tomorrow?

That’s tough.

Consider this… After 13 seasons Halladay’s stat line matches up almost identically with former Yankees’ southpaw, Ron Guidry. In 14 years Guidry went 170-69 with a 3.29 ERA. Like Halladay, Guidry won 20 games three times, including the otherworldly 25-3 with a 1.74 ERA and took home the Cy Young Award in 1978. Also like Halladay, Guidry averaged 235 innings per season and tallied 21 complete games at age 32 in 1983. More notably, Guidry got to the World Series three times, won twice and went 3-1 with 1.69 ERA in four starts.

Now here’s the kicker… Guidry was taken off the Hall-of-Fame ballot in 2002 after nine years where he never achieved more than 8.8 percent of the vote (75 percent is needed for enshrinement).

Are we sure Halladay is a Hall of Famer right now?

Yes, comparing statistics across different eras is usually foolhardy. Hell, it’s even tough to compare stats amongst players on the same team or across leagues in the same year. The great players don’t play the game to achieve stats and sometimes the natural course of the game can skew the numbers is all sorts of directions. However, it’s worth noting that like Halladay, Guidry was viewed as the best pitcher on earth for a number of seasons.

Ron_Guidry Look at this quote from Guidry’s old teammate Willie Randolph:

“I’ve always said Ron Guidry, pound for pound, was the fiercest competitor I ever played with. Nobody wanted to give him a chance when he first came up. Too skinny, too small, they all thought. They couldn’t see what he had in his heart. He had a big one and a lot of determination.”

Then there’s this one from his teammate Reggie Jackson in an Sports Illustrated story from the 1978 season:

“He and [Jim] Palmer are the two best athletes among pitchers I've ever seen. The few times I've seen him swing the bat make me think he could be an every-day player, the way Bob Gibson could have been.”

And of course this gem from longtime rival manager Whitey Herzog:

“He’s not God, but he’s close.”

The thing about that is Guidry never got a sniff for enshrinement into the Hall of Fame and his 1978 season was one of the greatest of a generation.

Now this isn’t a case for Ron Guidry (or anyone else) or against Roy Halladay—far from it. Nor is it an expose on the knee-jerk tendencies of the Hall-of-Fame vote. Maybe the point is, after all, we going to get a few more seasons to watch Halladay pitch and it’s going to be a blast watching him put the finishing touches on his Hall-of-Fame resume.

Comment

Rocking the vote, part II

Roberto_alomar For a random hump day during the first week of January, there was quite a bit of interesting stories out there today. The Gilbert Arenas suspension is the big nation news since it very well could turn out to be the richest loss from a suspension and/or voided contract in sports history.

Actually, I don’t know if that’s a fact, but I seriously doubt any player has ever had a contract as large as the one Arenas has, canceled. Including the remainder of this season, Arenas is owed approximately $88.25 million until the end of 2014.

For Arenas sake let’s hope that he has some money in the bank because it sounds like he’s going to need it.

We’ll dive back into the Arenas mess later. For now the fact that just one player was elected into the baseball Hall of Fame casts even more bad pub on a broken system in which the BBWAA presides. Those guys could mess up a one-car parade.

There, I said it.

Regardless, it seems as if the biggest issues regarding Hall of Fame election are handing out the label of “first-ballot” Hall of Famer, which underscores certain biases members of the BBWAA possess. As I wrote earlier, there has never been a unanimous election to the Hall. In fact, the highest percentage of the vote ever received is 98.8 percent for Nolan Ryan in 1999 and Tom Seaver in 1992. That’s as close as anyone (including Babe Ruth, Hank Aaron, Ty Cobb, Walter Johnson, Connie Mack, etc.) has ever come to getting 100 percent.

The truth is some guys don’t get votes because of negligence. For instance, last year a guy named Corky Simpson in Arizona left Rickey Henderson off his ballot because… well, who knows why. However, Corky had no trouble voting for Matt Williams. Corky wrote about how he did not include Mark McGwire because of questions regarding steroids, but still voted for Williams despite his inclusion on the Mitchell Report and the investigation into steroid use in baseball.

Chances are Corky got a few good quotes from Williams when he made the trip to the ballpark, which, sadly, matters.

There is some sort of cachet to being a first-ballot Hall of Famer not amongst those enshrined, but by the writers that vote. Frankly, that’s just stupid. How can a guy not be Hall-of-Fame worthy one year, but good enough the next?

A Hall of Famer is a Hall of Famer is a Hall of Famer. You mean to say Joe DiMaggio, the proclaimed “greatest living ballplayer,” (when he was living, of course) was less of a Hall of Famer because he did not get in on the first ballot?

Either way, Andre Dawson deserved to have some company when he is inducted to the Hall of Fame next summer. In his ninth time on the ballot, Dawson cleared the needed 75 percent of the vote by just a handful. Meanwhile, Roberto Alomar, the best second baseman I’ve ever seen and the best in the Majors since Joe Morgan, came five votes away from getting in on the first ballot. In fact, so sure that Alomar would be elected, the MLB Network set up a camera and sent a production crew to the Alomar homestead to record his reaction when the inevitable good news came.

It never came.

In falling five votes short, Alomar was denied in an election in which five voters sent back blank ballots while admitted steroid user David Segui, pitchers Pat Hentgen and Kevin Appier, as well as first baseman-turned-broadcaster, Eric Karros, combined for five votes. That’s 10 wasted votes and does not include the nine votes spent on Ellis Burks and Robin Ventura.

All of those guys were nice players, but there isn’t a Hall of Famer in the bunch and if the people who voted for them don’t know that, they should not vote.

So with those 19 votes that were spent on making a point, silly politics, vendettas, or drunken dares, very easily could have been spread out so that worthy candidates like Alomar and Bert Blyleven could join Dawson.

Apparently there were several instances where the unfortunate incident where Alomar spit on umpire John Hirschbeck. Writers are holding this mistake against Alomar despite the fact that Hirschbeck and Alomar have buried the hatchet and become friends. This protest vote was made despite the fact that Ty Cobb, Babe Ruth, Cap Anson, and Juan Marichal are Hall of Famers. Among those names are men who attacked a crippled fan, punched an umpire, beat an opponent on the head with a bat, and helped foster nearly a half-century of institutional racism.

Some say without Cap Anson, baseball never would have been a sport that denied the inclusion of some because of the color of their skin.

But, you know, Alomar spit at a guy...

Jeff_bagwell Nice Hall of Fame you have there, baseball.

Oh, but we’ll go through all this again next year. It will be the same ridiculous song and dance only with a few new names on the list like Jeff Bagwell and Larry Walker, both of whom are worthy.

So here’s my 2010 list:

• Jeff Bagwell
• Larry Walker
• Roberto Alomar
• Bert Blyleven
• Tim Raines
• Jack Morris
• Fred McGriff
• Barry Larkin
• Edgar Martinez
• Lee Smith

Certainly the numbers matter, but for me something Billy Wagner told me about Bagwell carries much more weight—Bagwell was the best teammate Wagner ever had, he said. Just like with Dawson, the respect Bagwell’s peers had for him matter much more than the results celebrated from an anachronistic organization.

Comment

Comment

Rocking the vote

Bert-blyleven If I were a member of the BBWAA, this would be the first year I would be eligible to vote for the Hall of Fame. Of course, I am not a member of the BBWAA for the same reason I was not in Skull & Bones.

They wouldn’t have me.

Damn progressive and forward thinking Internet.

But just for amusement purposes only, I am offering a Hall-of Fame ballot anyway. In addition, I will continue to urge the Hall of Fame to put together another voting body instead of just BBWAA members.

Anyway, here’s the list (in no particular order):

• Roberto Alomar
• Bert Blyleven
• Tim Raines
• Andre Dawson
• Jack Morris
• Fred McGriff
• Barry Larkin
• Edgar Martinez
• Lee Smith

I also considered Dale Murphy, Dave Parker, Don Mattingly, Alan Trammell and Mark McGwire. Truth be told, I had been more of an absolutist against McGwire in recent years and I still have him off the list because I just don’t know enough about his era yet.

Plus, McGwire routinely had seasons where he had more home runs than singles and that’s just weird.

So debate them all you want, but remember this—of the 26 guys on the ballot, I am now old enough to have seen all of them play. Ancient.

The thing I don’t get about the Hall of Fame voting?

Not one player got a unanimous vote into the Hall of Fame. Not Babe Ruth, not Ty Cobb, not Connie Mack, not Cal Ripken, not Hank Aaron, not Willie Mays, not Ted Williams, not Joe DiMaggio, not Mike Schmidt, not Nolan Ryan and definitely not Rickey Henderson.

No one. Ever.

Hell, Joe DiMaggio wasn’t even a first ballot Hall of Famer.

Seriously.

As stated in the past, baseball is full of stupid traditions going back to the very beginning of the game. Two of the dumbest are the traditions in which only white men could play in the Major Leagues and giving the Hall of Fame vote to the BBWAA.

At least one of them has been corrected.

So why is it dumb to give certain writers the vote for life? Because a lot of them have agendas and can’t make peace with that pesky axiom that a journalist must be objective.

Y’know, that old chestnut.

Venerable ballscribe Bill Conlin of the Daily News admitted in a column from last year that he didn’t vote for Nolan Ryan for the Hall of Fame in 1999 because, well… just because. Conlin admitted that he was making a “political statement” which is another way to say that he had an agenda. That stuff is all well and good if Conlin were voting for something political like president or city council, but the Hall of Fame?

I must admit that I’m a little excited to see who was slighted by the voting this year. I’m trashy like that.

Comment

4 Comments

Mark it zero, dude

Goose GossageGoose Gossage finally was elected to the Hall of Fame after it seems as if the BBWAA voters were shamed into giving him his due after last years' snub. Perhaps it was the fact that Goose narrowly missed out on getting elected last year sealed the deal this year. For one thing it forced some folks to go back dig deeper into his record. The thing about Gossage's career is that it's one thing on paper and something much deeper on the game logs. Sure, Gossage was the most dominant closer in the game for a handful of years. In fact he was so good that the Yankees went out and signed him to a big deal before the '78 season even though Sparky Lyle won the Cy Young Award as the teams' closer in 1977. But Goose spent the last decade of his career bouncing around the league from team to team and fighting injuries.

At a quick glance, the last bunch of years for Gossage hardly looked like the ledger of a guy headed for the Hall of Fame... and aren't Hall of Famers supposed to be as consistent as clockwork?

But what the stat page doesn't show is how Gossage put together a bunch of those saves - especially during the early years. These days when a closer is considered a workhorse for getting the occasional four-out save from time-to-time, it is fun to look at Gossage's 1977 game log in his lone season with the Pittsburgh Pirates.

A quick glance there shows that of his 26 saves, only five were of three outs or less. Nine of them were two innings, three were two-plus innings, three were three innings or longer and the coup de grace, a mid September four-inning save in which Goose gave up one hit and struck out five.

Yeah, that's right, a four-inning save.

So is Gossage Hall of Fame worthy... yes, absolutely. But then again based on some of the other folks enshrined in Cooperstown, Gossage wasn't the only player who should have earned election to the Hall today. Gossage was baseball's most dominant relief pitcher in the 1970s and the early 1980s so based on that criteria, Jim Rice should have been elected today as well. Why? Because Jim Rice was the game's most dominant hitter from 1977 to 1979 and continued to be a perennial All Star to the mid-1980s by posting some gaudy numbers in an era before performance-enhancing drugs.

And if Tony Perez was good enough to be in the Hall of Fame, then Andre Dawson should be enshrined, too. And if Gaylord Perry or Robin Roberts are in then Bert Blyleven should be, too.

Jim RiceWith that in mind here is how I would vote if I were a Hall of Fame voting member of the BBWAA, keeping in mind, of course, that I will never actively choose to be a member of the BBWAA. There's a better chance that I would join the GOP or local Aryans group than be asked to join to BBWAA.

Anyway, here's how I would have voted in the current system:

Rich Gossage Jim Rice Bert Blyleven Andre Dawson Lee Smith Jack Morris Tim Raines Dave Parker Dale Murphy Tommy John Don Mattingly

In this ballot I give points for guys who were the league's best players at their position for a bunch of years in a row. I also give kudos to players who have remarkable seasons/performances, etc. In that vein, though most of his career was underwhelming, Roger Maris would get my vote.

This is how I would have voted if the Hall of Fame wasn't so watered down with the likes of Perez and Ryne Sandberg:

Gossage Rice

That's it (though it's pretty hard to ignore Raines... maybe his 808 career stolen bases will garner a second-look next year).

As far as Mark McGwire goes, the answer is simple:

No.

It will remain that way until baseball decides what to do with the records of the Steroids Era players. My suggestion is to separate them in the same way that the records pre-1900 were differentiated. Baseball calls the seasons after 1900 "The Modern Era." Perhaps the seasons from 1990 and on can be called "The Post-Modern Era."

Why not, postmodernism certainly worked well for Beckett.

4 Comments

Comment

Worst person in the world

Yesterday, the Hall of Fame Veterans Committee announced… nothing. After much deliberation, posturing, campaigning and whatever else the baseball folks with their secret ballots do, the Veterans Committee decided to tell good folks like Ron Santo, Marvin Miller, Buck O’Neil, Gil Hodges, Walter O’Malley and Jim Kaat to, well… maybe we shouldn’t rephrase it.

Let’s just say it ends with “… and die.”

Some already have.

Let's start with the fact that the Baseball Hall of Fame is watered down. Based on some invisible criteria that elected borderline players – statistically speaking – it’s a real crime that Santo, O’Neil, Hodges, O’Malley, Don Newcombe and gasp! Marvin Miller can’t get the votes.

Do those electors have a clue as to what their mission is?

So what’s the deal with these folks? Is there anything that can be done about possibly taking the Hall of Fame voting away from the Veterans Committee and some sycophants in the Baseball Writers Association of America?

No. Probably not.

Nevertheless, it doesn’t mean we can’t pick on them. At least that’s what Keith Olbermann did last night on his show Countdown. In his nightly feature, “Worst Person in the World,” Olbermann awarded the top place to the Veterans Committee (ahead of Anne Coulter and some guy who e-mailed a bomb threat into his school) saying they should do the correct thing and quit.

Here’s Olbermann:

But our winners tonight: The Baseball Hall of Fame Committee on Veterans. Given a choice of such overlooked immortals as Gil Hodges and Ron Santo, Jim Kaat and Maury Wills, and such movers-and-shakers as Dodger owner Walter O'Malley, and players' union founder Marvin Miller.

Today, they elected... nobody.

Santo came closest – five votes short of the spot in the Hall of Fame he has long deserved. There will not be another vote until 2009... 2011 for the non-players.

The electors – including 61 current Hall of Famers – should voluntarily resign their positions, or be compelled to. They have made fools of themselves.

Again.

The Baseball Hall of Fame Committee on Veterans, Tuesday's Worst Persons In The World!

Here’s an idea for the Hall of Fame – let’s start over. Let’s take everyone out of the Hall of Fame… Babe Ruth, Walter Johnson, Cy Young, etc., etc. and vote them back in. You know, rebuild it all from scratch. This time contributions to the game, citizenship and playing ability all count.

And let’s get people to vote on them who really care. Olbermann should get a vote. Bob Costas, too. Just not the same old, same old people who have been doing it in the past. The world changes, elements of baseball should as well.

On another note...
Barry Bonds needs bigger shoes.

Comment

Comment

Cleaning house

Only 10-year members of the Baseball Writers Association of America are eligible to vote for the Hall of Fame. To be a member of the BBWAA, one has to work for a daily newspaper or The Associated Press, which, in the changing landscape of the media seems almost as archaic and anachronistic as allowing one specific group vote for something that some folks find so virtuous.

No, I’m not a member of the BBWAA. Plus, I agree with Woody Allen’s sentiment that I would never join an organization that would have someone like me as a member.

But that doesn’t mean I don’t have an opinion on the most recent voting by the BBWAA to enshrine just Cal Ripken and Tony Gwynn is the equally as anachronistic Hall of Fame. I guess this is because I don’t seem to understand what it takes to be a Hall of Famer any more.

Let’s start with this – if I had a vote for the Hall of Fame balloting, I would have voted for Cal Ripken, Tony Gwynn and Jim Rice. Ripken and Gwynn are obvious choices and epitomize – in my view – what the Hall of Fame is supposed to be about. Rice gets my vote because in 1978 he was the best player in the game, and from 1978 to 1986 he always one of the most feared hitters in either league.

Baseball statistics really don’t mean much to me and serve no other purpose than to back up specific arguments. That said, the following players would have received careful consideration from me (if I had a vote):

· Bert Blyleven
· Andre Dawson
· Rich Gossage
· Tommy John
· Jack Morris
· Dale Murphy
· Dave Parker
· Lee Smith

I keep changing my mind on Blyleven, and depending upon who is on the ballot next year, I suspect I’d give big Bert and that nasty curveball the vote. Andre Dawson and Dale Murphy fall into similar circumstances as Rice since there was a stretch in the 1980s where both players – specifically Murphy – were the best hitters in the league.

I’m not so sold on Goose Gossage because I mostly remember him as an oft-injured reliever who bounced from team to team in the latter part of his career. Tony Perez did that, too, and I don’t think he should be in the Hall of Fame either.

Why not Perez? Well, that’s easy. He was never the best player on any of his teams, let alone the best player in the league. Then again, if Perez is in than everyone on the list posted above ought to be in, too.

Actually, if Perez is in then why isn’t Chili Davis or Andres Galarraga? How about Dwight Evans or Harold Baines? What about Joe Carter or Rusty Staub?

Maybe it’s time to start taking people out of the Hall of Fame? Maybe it’s time for the Hall of Fame to take the vote away from the BBWAA and give it to a more inclusive organization – or at least one that will be around in the next decade.

Actually, that sounds like a fun exercise… who should we take out of the Hall of Fame? Let’s start with Perez and follow it up with:

  • Bill Mazeroski
  • Jim Bunning
  • Phil Rizzuto
  • Red Schoendienst
  • Enos Slaughter
  • Rick Ferrell
  • George Kell
  • Travis Jackson
  • Hack Wilson
  • Addie Joss
  • Joe Sewell
  • Roger Connor
  • Freddie Lindstrom
  • George Kelly
  • Lefty Gomez
  • Ross Youngs
  • Dave Bancroft
  • Jake Beckley
  • Chick Hafey
  • Harry Hooper
  • Joe Kelley
  • Rube Marquard
  • Earle Combs
  • Jesse Haines
  • Lloyd Waner
  • Red Faber
  • Elmer Flick
  • Eppa Rixey
  • Edd Roush
  • Max Carey
  • Ted Lyons
  • Ray Schalk
  • Dazzy Vance
  • Rabbit Maranville
  • Bobby Wallace
  • Buck Ewing
  • Jim O’Rourke
  • Johnny Evers
  • Joe Tinker
  • Frank Chance
  • Tommy McCarthy
  • Roger Bresnahan
  • Herb Pennock

    Granted, I know about as much about Ray Schalk as I do about nuclear physics, but judging from the fact that most of the players on the list are inductees from the Veterans Committee it seems as if they got in because they were “good guys” or were liked by the right people. So if that’s a criterion, let Dale Murphy in and keep Perez in there, too.

    Then again maybe Ray Schalk was as good as Sandy Koufax or even Jim Rice for a few seasons?

    While we’re at it, answer this question: How many voters out there liked Mark McGwire in 1998? It seems to me that he filled a lot of writers’ notebooks and even made some a little bit of money, too.

    Is Mark McGwire’s bid at baseball immortality being sacrificed for Major League Baseball’s sins? Or was he a willing partner in the dance of death?

  • Comment

    Comment

    Why the Hall not?

    The ballots for the 2007 Baseball Hall of Fame class are out and without getting too much into it, there is a little hubbub about certain candidates. Nevertheless, if I had a vote –- which I don’t –- here are the players I would select for enshrinement:

  • Tony Gwynn
  • Jim Rice
  • Cal Ripken Jr.

    The following is a list of candidates that I liked, but wouldn’t select for one reason or another:

  • Bert Blyleven
  • Andre Dawson
  • Rich Gossage
  • Tommy John
  • Jack Morris
  • Dale Murphy
  • Dave Parker
  • Lee Smith

    Am I missing anyone?

    A couple of notes: This could be the first Hall of Fame ballot where I was old enough to see every one of the candidates play. In fact, I remember Dave Parker’s famous throw in the 1979 All-Star Game and Jim Rice’s epic 1978 season. I remember Andre Dawson in 1987, Dale Murphy in 1982 and ’83 and Jack Morris pitching in the greatest World Series game ever.

    Additionally, maybe they could come up with a new rule where a one person is removed from the Hall of Fame after every five are elected? Let’s start with Tony Perez and Bill Mazeroski.

  • Comment