Viewing entries in
Academy Awards

1 Comment

The Dude abides

Dude If there is an actor who plays down-and-out, beaten and burned up better than Jeff Bridges, I haven’t seen him. That’s the reason why I didn’t like watching the movie Seabiscuit, which starred Bridges, and wasn’t totally convinced of his portrayal as the President of the United States in The Contender.

No, this has nothing to with Bridges’ acting chops. The fact is, the guy can act as well as he can grow hair and put on weight. Hell, he even made Tron watchable, and there is something to be said about a dude who was nominated for an Academy Award as the best supporting actor following his first movie, The Last Picture Show. That came when he was just 22 in 1971. Now he’s 60 and nominated for a fifth time.

Baring an upset, Bridges will get his first Oscar tonight.

Strangely, though he’s had one of the best Hollywood careers ever, Bridges is “The Dude.” Who doesn’t love The Dude? Even Bridges loves The Dude. I read an interview where he said The Big Lebowski is one of the movies that just sucks him in and he watches it as if it wasn’t even him up there drinking caucasians, bowling and getting to the bottom of a tangled caper. Bridges says if he finds the movie on TV he tells himself he’s just going to watch a little bit.

“Often I’ll be watching TV and I’ll be hitting the clicker, and if a movie of mine will come on, I’ll rarely get hooked in cause I’ve seen the thing. But The Big Lebowski, when that gets on, I’ll always say, ‘I’ll just watch Turturro … I’ll hang in until Turturro shows up.’ And then once he’s there, I’ll say, ‘I’ll just watch until he gets to the part about sticking the gun up his ass.’”

See, a guy who gives interviews like that should have multiple Oscars. Better yet, he should have won just because he used his own clothes for wardrobe and that wasn’t even the first movie where he wore his own gear for one of his characters. Watch closely the next time The Big Lebowski and The Fisher King is on because you will see Bridges in some cartoon-y Japanese baseball shirt in both pictures.

But whatever, right? Bridges doesn’t need an Academy Award as some sort of validation. Still, it’s his turn. After nearly 40 years in the game and five nominations, he has to get one just like Al Pacino and Martin Scorsese had to get one. So just put it down on the trophy for Bridges playing a used up and alcoholic country singer, Bad Blake, in Crazy Heart. Surely The Dude would approve, too.

Nevertheless, there are many, many things that I just don’t get. The list is vast and long enough even to fill all the space available on this server.

Hey, I’ve written this before, so bear with me as we go over it again. But before we dive into the mysteries of chemistry, calculus and why hockey fans bother to care why the rest of the sporting public doesn't care much for their sport[1], I hope there is someone who can explain the allure of the television broadcast of the Academy Awards.

I get the Academy Awards as much as my wife understands the appeal of a 162-game Major League Baseball season, the three weeks of the Tour de France or why I sit on the edge of my seat to watch people run for 26.2 miles. No, it's not insanity or some sort of self-mutilation. Far from it. Instead it's an appreciation of nuance and ...

Wait, no, it's insanity.

Quentin_tarantino So tonight I will join in some good, old-fashioned insanity and watch the Super Bowl of glamour (nice sports metaphor, huh?), debauchery and depravity with my old lady (it's a term) and tune into the Academy Awards. I will also comment on the fashion choices of the stars in attendance without irony. The fact that the accessories worn by Angelina Jolie will likely cost more than my house isn't the issue. Instead, I will just act like the Academy Awards are oh so important and are rightly celebrated at a level higher than the Nobel Peace Prize.

So as America attempts to dig itself out of its cultural and economic abyss, we might as well handicap it. Oh yes, I know there is no way to judge art or acting unless all of the actors play the same part. I also know that the Academy Awards are inherently a big pile of BS. But whatever. As long as Jeff Bridges gets recognized we’ll sit there and take it.

Supporting actress
Mo’Nique, Precious
Didn’t see this one, but it sounds like the feel-good story of the movie scene. Besides, I couldn’t go for Vera Farmiga in Up in the Air, or Maggie Gyllenhaal in Crazy Heart. No, it has nothing to do with their abilities or performances. As far as I can tell they are both worthy nominees. However, one character’s plot line was too predictable and the other was too unbelievable. Hey, the movie should matter, too.

Supporting actor
Christoph Waltz, Inglorious Basterds
Going against the theory that an acting award can only be given if all the actors are playing the same part, Christoph Waltz was better than the other nominees. So there.

Actress
Meryl Streep, Julie & Julia
Oh why the hell not? The Yankees won the World Series last year… why shouldn’t Meryl Streep get another Oscar.

What, could Sandra Bullock win it? Really?

Actor
Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart
We already explained all this. You mean you made it this far and weren’t paying attention?

Director
Quentin Tarantino, Inglorious Basterds
Going with Tarantino here strictly for the speech he would deliver. It could be one of those flighty, rambling, fun things where he thanks everyone from Wim Wenders to Vincent Price to Fiona Apple. Who doesn’t want to hear that? Plus, there is an outside shot he could curse on live TV. I’m for that, too.

However, by all accounts it seems as if Kathryn Bigelow and James Cameron are neck-and-neck here. I can stand behind The Hurt Locker, but not Avatar. No way.

Best picture
The Hurt Locker
Actually, my choice should be, “anything but Avatar,” which totally ripped off the story line from Dances With Wolves. Besides, where do they get all the money to give James Cameron to make those thin-storied movies he makes? Did they just print it up and give it to him?

***

You know what will be the best part about the show tonight? Do you really have to ask?

Well, OK then… Twitter. It’s Mystery Science Theatre 3000 come to life. Make sure you follow funny people who won’t mix in silliness like spring training baseball play-by-play.


[1] This is incredibly baffling. Tell a hockey fan you really aren't hip to their sport and get ready for the dissertation, and, worse, an invitation to a game. Seriously, these people (yes, I wrote these people) just don't understand why everyone doesn't see what they see. Yet, they still have that, "Why can't we just be different like everyone else," attitude. Yes, I generalize because I can. Here's the thing. I'm a huge fan of track and field, long-distance running and professional bicycling. I just love it. It's a tough, grueling sport that just gets me all wound up just anticipating a big race or meet. But here's the thing... I don't want the mass populace to get it because that way I don't have to share my passion for some dumbed-down mass audience. So please, folks, let me have my geeky endurance sports with all my dork friends. Here's an idea: go watch some hockey. They really seem to want you to.

1 Comment

Comment

There will be blood (and Mickey Rourke)

mickeyNeedless to say, there are many things I just don't get. The list is vast. Long enough even to fill all the space available on this server. But before we dive into the mysteries of chemistry, calculus and why hockey fans bother to care why the rest of the sporting public doesn't care much for their sport[1], I hope there is someone who can explain the allure of the television broadcast of the Academy Awards.

I get the Academy Awards as much as my wife understands the appeal of a 162-game Major League Baseball season, the three weeks of the Tour de France or why I sit on the edge of my seat to watch people run for 26.2 miles. No, it's not insanity or some sort of self-mutilation. Far from it. Instead it's an appreciation of nuance and ... wait, no, it's insanity.

So tonight I will join in some good, old-fashioned insanity and watch the Super Bowl of glamour (nice sports metaphor, huh?), debauchery and depravity with my old lady (it's a term) and tune into the Academy Awards. I will also comment on the fashion choices of the stars in attendance without irony. The fact that the accessories worn by Angelina Jolie will likely cost more than my house isn't the issue. Instead, I will just act like the Academy Awards are oh so important and are rightly celebrated at a level higher than the Nobel Peace Prize.

So as America spirals into the cultural and economic abyss, we might as well handicap it. Might as well check into that whole live Twittering thing, too. Might be going to hell in a bucket, babe, but at least I'm enjoying the ride.

Here goes, and yes, I know there is no way to judge art or acting unless all of the actors play the same part. I also know that the Academy Awards are inherently a big pile of BS.

Supporting actress: Taraji P. Henson, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button OK, I hated this movie. Actually, that's not right... I hate racism and inequality. I just disliked The Curious Case of Benjamin Button a whole bunch. Nevertheless, I couldn't wait for Ms. Henson to get back on the screen. More importantly, Ms. Henson shares the same birthday as Ted Leo (same date and year according to wikipedia), was born in The District (holla!) and kicked ass in Hustle & Flow. She can act the way you can rack up out-of-control credit debt.

Supporting actor: Heath Ledger, The Dark Night Duh. He definitely stole the show in this one. Plus, there's that whole death thing... maybe not the best career move, but it definitely earns points with the Academy.

Actress: Kate Winslet, The Reader I missed this one, but I read that Kate Winslet said this picture is the last one in which she appears nude. End of an era?

Actor: Mickey Rourke, The Wrestler Daniel Day-Lewis could be on the screen speaking Arabic and I would rave. There's just something about that guy... or maybe it's the fact that he skipped out on becoming the biggest movie star ever and disappeared for years because he was learning how to be a shoe cobbler. Hey, people need shoes.

But Mickey Rourke in The Wrestler was almost to Daniel Day-Lewis levels. He was sublime and brutal much like DeNiro in Raging Bull. Just awesome and easily the best performance of the year. More importantly, Mr. Rourke could win and then make a speech that will put the dude with the dump-out button to work.

On another note, my wife says Sean Penn is far superior as Harvey Milk... yeah, probably. But c'mon, a 'roided up Mickey Rourke rasslin'... She also says Meryl Streep gave easily the best performance of anyone this year, but that's a given. She's like the Harlem Globetrotters to everyone's Washington Generals.

Director: The guy who made Slumdog Millionaire Missed this one. It was showing the day I took the kids to see WALL-E, or Bolt, or Kung-fu Panda or something like that.

Best picture: Slumdog Millionaire Whatever. I'm not going to pay money to watch kids get hurt and people suffer. I already know life is difficult and I don't need to get "perspective" from a movie. I can read the news or look at pictures of Dick Cheney if I want to know the world can be a horrible place.

Speaking of the Academy Awards, inevitably the hosts and presenters will always tell us, the viewer, how many people are watching worldwide? How do they know? And if they know how many people are watching the Academy Awards worldwide, don't they also know how many people turned on the TV and fell asleep? Or how many people turned it on but left the room to take a phone call or something?

I really don't think they know what they're talking about.


[1] This is incredibly baffling. Tell a hockey fan you really aren't hip to their sport and get ready for the dissertation, and, worse, an invitation to a game. Seriously, these people (yes, I wrote these people) just don't understand why everyone doesn't see what they see. Yet, they still have that, "Why can't we just be different like everyone else," attitude.

Yes, I generalize because I can.

Here's the thing. I'm a huge fan of track and field, long-distance running and professional bicycling. I just love it. It's a tough, grueling sport that just gets me all wound up just anticipating a big race or meet. But here's the thing... I don't want the mass populace to get it because that way I don't have to share my passion for some dumbed-down mass audience. So please, folks, let me have my geeky endurance sports with all my dork friends. Here's an idea: go watch some hockey. They really seem to want you to.

Comment

Comment

You're all winners!

ddlThis is going to be the last baseball-related post for the next few days. Next week this space will hold nothing but the scene and the scenesters from Clearwater so it's good to diversify. You know... goof on other goofiness for a while. In the meantime, I'm going to go see There Will Be Blood [1] before my wife's annual Academy Awards extravaganza at the house on Sunday night. From what I'm told this year's menu will include a new red lentil soup recipe as well as baked brie with raspberries and almonds[2].

Once again my suggestion to serve a six-foot hoagie with a pony keg was ignored.

Anyway, this effort is hardly going to be an effort at all. In fact, it's essentially going to be recycled from last February when the Phillies announced their Wall of Fame ballot. This year the club added Doug Glanville, Greg Gross, Jim Fregosi and Lancaster Countian Gene Garber to the ballot, though it seems unlikely that anyone from that group will gain election for enshrinement, in which the criterion is:

Phillies players with five or more years of service are eligible. Managers and coaches need four or more years of service.

In addition to a player's statistical record, consideration is given to longevity, ability, contributions to the Phillies and baseball, character and special achievements.

This year the 15 players on the ballot are:

Pitchers: Larry Christenson, Jim Konstanty, Gene Garber, Rick Wise Catcher: Darren Daulton Infielders: John Kruk, Fred Luderus, Juan Samuel Outfielders: Lenny Dykstra, Von Hayes, Greg Gross, Doug Glanville Manager: Gene Mauch, Jim Fregosi Coaches: Mike Ryan

Out of the 15 eligible, I cast my three vote(s) for Jim Konstanty, Darren Daulton and Gene Mauch.

Konstanty gets the vote simply for the 1950 season. During that year, as a relief pitcher, Konstanty appeared in a then Major League-record 74 games and was National League's MVP. When the Phillies got to their first World Series since 1915, Konstanty took the ball and started Game 1for his first start in approximately four seasons.

Ultimately Konstanty only won 51 games and saved 54 in 6½ seasons for the Phillies, but he was one of the pioneers in the game as a true relief specialist, yet was also versatile and strong enough to pile up more than a 100 innings.

Don't tell me the Phillies wouldn't like to have a relief pitcher to toss 70 or so innings this season.

I don't think I have to get too into why Daulton should be enshrined. Simply, he may have been one of the most important players - for his time - the franchise ever had. Importance of a player, of course, belies simple things such as numbers on a stat page and in that regard Daulton is both simple and complex. He led the league in both RBIs and knee operations... then moved to the outfield after two decades of squatting.

Better yet, he was the straw that stirred the drink in '93. Go ahead... ask anybody.

Gene MauchMauch, on the other hand, was regarded as one of the best baseball minds as well as the most star-crossed. He has managed more seasons without reaching the World Series than anyone else. Worse, Mauch had come so excruciatingly close to getting there so many times only to fall through a trap door.

There was 1964, which people around here remember, but then in 1982 he guided the California Angels to 2-0 lead in the best of five series only to drop the final three games to the Milwaukee Brewers. That was the first time that had ever happened.

In 1986, Mauch's Angels were one pitch away from beating the Boston Red Sox in five games of the best-of-seven ALCS before Donnie Moore served up the famous home run to Dave Henderson. The Red Sox went on to win Game 5 and then games 6 and 7 to further extend Mauch's curse.

Yet for the Phillies, Mauch turned a laughingstock into a contender by winning 646 games in a little more than eight seasons. From 1962 to 1967, Mauch's Phillies finished .500 or better in every season, which was a rarity for the franchise.

There it is... go vote online at the Phillies' web site.

In the meantime, here are my Oscar picks [3]based on no knowledge whatsoever:

Supporting actress: Cate Blanchett, I'M NOT THERE Supporting actor: Javier Bardem, NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN Actress: Ellen Page, JUNO Actor: Daniel Day-Lewis, THERE WILL BE BLOOD Director: The Coen Bros., NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN Best picture: There Will Be Blood


[1] Again. [2] Yeah, we're doing alright. [3] Yes, I know there is no way to judge art or acting unless all of the actors play the same part. I also know that the Academy Awards are inherently a big pile of BS.

Comment